Philippe specialises in the valuation of intellectual property and the pricing of contractual contingent and derivative provisions. He is a former leader of the Washington National Tax Transfer Pricing Office of a Big Four Accounting Firm, and a member of the board of the National Association for Business Economics Transfer Pricing Symposium held annually in Washington, DC.
Paul and Philippe discuss:
- What ‘Pareto optimal’ means in the context of controlled transactions
- The related concept of ‘moral hazard’, and how it featured in early OECD discussions regarding the BEPS project
- The implications for the four steps required when applying the arm’s length principle, including the role of agreements in substantiating Pareto optimality
- Examples of transaction types for which the concept of Pareto optimality can create great clarity
- Examples of how Philippe has used this concept to achieve better outcomes for his clients in transfer pricing challenges
- Key takeaways for heads of tax and transfer pricing practitioners when designing transfer pricing policies.